Military Police

FALL 2015

Military Police contains information about military police functions in maneuver and mobility support, area security, law and order, internment/resettlement, and police intelligence operations.

Issue link: https://militarypolice.epubxp.com/i/567773

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 31 of 51

MILITARY POLICE 30 attached, which is the traditional means of augmenting CID offces. The common challenge with attached Soldiers is that by the time they develop into an effective team, their tem- porary attachment expires. As a result, many CID offces struggle with the certifcation process and are unable to de- vote prolonged time to quality training. Therefore, the per- manent assignment of new Soldiers enabled the JBLM CID offce to invest in a team that could be molded and effectively used to suppress drug activity in support of commanders. Following their assignment to CID, the Soldiers under- went an extensive 8-week, battalion-approved certifcation in which they were trained to conduct investigations, use contingency limitation funds (money used for emergency and unusual expenses incurred during investigations and crime prevention), and execute covert drug suppression op- erations. Although the time requirement for the certifcation process is taxing, the long-term benefts have outweighed the short-term discomfort. One beneft is the creation of depth within the team. In the traditional model of limited time and personnel, DSTs could be crippled by reassignments, mandatory career-enhancing training, or routine and emer- gency leave. Due to the newly robust size of the JBLM DST, the temporary loss of a few Soldiers is not a catastrophic event. However, the most rewarding beneft of the increased size of the team is the ability to task-organize members into subteams. Within the larger DST, four smaller subteams are each aligned to separate brigade combat teams and are capable of autonomously conducting overt and covert drug suppression operations. This alignment not only provides senior mission commanders with a single point of contact for drug suppression activity within their units; it also provides the right allocation for proactive operations and results. The JBLM CID offce shifted from a reactive to a proac- tive approach when the DST certifcation was complete. In traditional CID practice, proactive efforts are measured by the quantity of target analysis fles developed, the amount of contingency limitation funds expended, and the quantity of controlled drugs seized from distributors. The key to the proactive focus is the development of target analysis fles (known as target packets in the operational Army). The data in three objective areas before and after the addition of personnel plainly shows the effectiveness of the DST. In all of calendar year 2013, the team developed 35 target analy- sis fles, expended $2,345 in contingency limitation funds, and seized 1,693 dosage units 4 of controlled substances. In contrast, during just the third quarter of calendar year 2014, the DST developed 30 target analysis fles, expended $13,518 in contingency limitation funds, and seized 14,989 dosage units of controlled substances. In just one quarter, the enhanced DST increased its proactive effectiveness by nearly 476 percent. In conclusion, to emulate the success of the only DST rat- ed as exceptional, the understanding of proactive operations must be redefned. Greater emphasis on improving commu- nication and relationships with senior mission commanders is the key to gaining additional personnel, especially in a time of dwindling resources. By appealing to the objective reasoning of senior mission commanders, through intelli- gence-driven, statistically-supported engagements, DST ele- ments shape their decisive operations. Failure to adopt this concept will hinder the ability of DSTs to move beyond the burdensome administrative requirements of drug-related cases and address them with traditional proactive measures. Endnotes: 1 "The Writings of George Washington," Vol. 8, John C. Fitzpatrick, ed., Government Printing Offce, Washington, D.C., October 1938, p. 359. 2 "Veterans and Drugs," National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence, Inc., , accessed on 5 August 2015. 3 Army Regulation 600-85, , 28 December 2012. 4 This use of dosage units refers to pills, ounces, grams, or milliliters of illegal substances seized. Captain Moore and Head- Joint Base Lewis–McChord. He is a graduate of the Military Police Cap- tains Career Course and holds degree in business and Chief Warrant Offcer Two Acevedo is the drug suppression chief at the Fort Lewis CID offce, Joint Base Lewis–McChord. Chief Warrant Offcer Two Sparling is the assistant special agent in charge of the Fort Lewis CID offce, Joint Base Lewis– McChord, Washington. He holds a bachelor's degree - istry y University, Quincy, Illinois; and degree of the Rockies.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Military Police - FALL 2015